The sound
It's been 5 years since I left this choir and boy has it changed. It's quite obvious that the quality of the singers has improved by leaps and bounds. Whereas just 5 years ago we struggled to have each section sing with a well blended tone, and struggled still more with getting chords right, today's choir had very few such problems. That's not to say there isn't room for improvement, but it's a very good start. The quality of individual singers has also improved tremendously -- they have some very good soloists.
The soprano section is easily the strongest -- I think they are held up by the 2 soloists. However, they have a tendancy to go flat (it could be the placement of the sound), and if the 2 soloists did not cover the section, many more split notes may have been more apparent. The fact that they had very good covering voices means that unlike before, the notes above a high F did not sound screechy -- they do a better job than VJ or VC with those Gs, As and above, and I think there was a high C somewhere in Verano Porteno. Well done.
This is followed by the altos, whose section's sound is led by the male alto. I've always been fascinated by the countertenor voice -- there's something ethereal about the sound. It's androgynous -- neither male nor female. It has this wonderful richness and results in a rich alto sound which is lacking in most of the choirs in Singapore. However, he needs to learn a little control and improve his technique on the notes above C -- I am not sure whether he was forcing himself too hard, but I found some of those higher notes somewhat harsh and a little offensive. They pierce right through the section because of its unique quality. His soft passages were very good though, and this was very apparent in some of the softer songs involving a lot of chord holding -- the wonderful rich alto sound just filled up the chords marvellously.
The guys were unremarkable -- with the basses being slightly stronger than the tenors who sounded weak most of the time. The tenors have a nice controlled tone, I think this started with this guy called Wei wei or something like that who sang in that manner, and, being section leader and student conductor, the rest just followed. It was either this control or the lack of numbers, but I found that for much of the concert, they were too soft to be audible.
No comments on the basses.
Overall, they had a very refreshing mature (yet not old) sound -- much more so than VJ or VC who sound very young. That suggests that their forte (sound wise) would be the more serious western pieces.
The program
The fact that they had suitable voices to sing Western classical pieces didn't mean that they did it well. The first half was Haydn's Nelson's Imperial Mass or something to that effect. I'm not familiar with the piece, but I'm sure it doesn't sound anything like that. It seemed to me to just sound like an hour's worth of warming up the singers' voices. Entries in the faster movements were consistently late. The pianist's timing and the choir's / soloists were out of sync at various points in time. It suggests that they did not have enough time practicing together with the conductor and the pianist, because these are things which could easily be fixed. A lot of choirs (and their conductors) seem to think these combined pieces can just come together without much work -- well it can't. There's no substitute or shortcut for practice time so far as this goes.
The second soprano seemed to struggle initially with her placement and often started flat and dull, creeping into the correct pitch. It may be the hall's poor acoustics -- she might not have been able to hear herself. I remember when we sang in that hall the sound would just disappear right after leaving your mouth, leaving you no feedback to adjust your sound.
The singers could not appreciate the layering of the parts. The loud and soft passages seemed contrived and forced, as did the ritards. So the whole of the first half was just basically one big shouting match and lacked any form of musicality. A wall of technically correct sound (though questionable at various points), devoid of any musical value. A practice session leading up to the second half perhaps. Ghastly. I was quite tempted to leave after the first half but did not.
The second half began with some forgettable Hungarian songs. The second song sounded distinctly out of tune.
The Japanese songs were probably the best of the second half. I really liked To The Island which was done beautifully. Nice chording, musical passages. My only regret was that they cut out the second repeat. Oh, and the tenor solo line -- what notes or key was that?
The South American pieces were ok. Verano Porteno was done at a very controlled pace, and lost a bit of the verve and energy. Personally, having sung this song for some 3 - 4 concerts in NUS and having heard it countless times elsewhere (it seems to be a popular recycled song) I'm a bit weary of the song, but the rendition was commendable.
Technically, the Filipino pieces are the most demanding in the concert-- more so than the Japanese pieces. The first piece was interesting -- the 2 soloists singing to each other. Again, the alto tried too hard, and the notes above C sounded forced. I felt perhaps that the nasal effect for the choir could have been emphasised more. The second piece involved a single solo -- I think either he must have been off form today, or the part is just too high -- I could see every vein on his neck pop, and he just could not reach those higher notes. He should probably have sung it a key lower on the spot and it wouldn't have been noticeable, because after half of the song, the choir sank into some hitherto unknown key combination with many decidedly strange and very out of tune chords.
Indonesian song was typically gimmicky with funny actions, but the song itself was weak.
They ended the night with Linden Lea. To set the record straight, it's only recently been a tradition to sing this at the end of every concert. Certainly, we never sang it between 1999 - 2003. I think we sang The Music's Always There. The melody for Linden Lea is beautiful and simple. The choir did it a bit too fast which took away some of the beauty of the song. Tuning was also a bit flat. The sops kept going flat on the F, and the tenors couldn't seem to sit on an E flat in pitch, resulting in many of the beautiful chords going slightly under. It's probably something in the placement of the sound.
Overall, I am ambivalent about my experience at the concert. I didn't particularly enjoy the song selection, and the singing didn't particularly wow me. I didn't really have a touching moment either to bring home with me. Having said that, I think the choir has a lot of potential, and I look forward to their concert next year.